<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Todd Mundt - Latest Comments in David Sedaris: Undecided Voters</title><link>http://toddmundt.disqus.com/</link><description>convergence, public media, productivity, social media</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:45:25 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: David Sedaris: Undecided Voters</title><link>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2008/10/21/david-sedaris-undecided-voters/#comment-3235855</link><description>Reading this piece at Hill Auditorium last week (Ann Arbor says, "Hi, Todd") David was disappointed to report that he had been unable to persuade his editor to accept David's preferred phrase "a platter of human shit."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SupportingTheAuthorialVoice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:45:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: David Sedaris: Undecided Voters</title><link>http://toddmundt.com/blog/2008/10/21/david-sedaris-undecided-voters/#comment-3235274</link><description>While I’m a big fan of David Sedaris, he (like most voters whose voting pattern was pre-determined years or decades before the current candidates were nominated) confuses thinking about the important issue of who to vote for (which many undecideds are doing) with not thinking about it (which, by definition, most decideds have stopped doing). My reply to Mr. Sedaris can be found at &lt;a href="http://www.undecidedman.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.undecidedman.com&lt;/a&gt; under “Naivite”.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Undecidedman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 15:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>